6.2 Business Strategy

Homearrow_rightBusiness Studies arrow_right Revision Notes arrow_right A Level arrow_right Business And Its Environment arrow_right Business Strategy
A Level Business · Change course
6.2.1 Developing business strategy
The meaning and purpose of business strategy
Definition A business strategy is a long-term plan of action designed to achieve the business's objectives — deciding where the business is going and how it will get there.
Tactics are short-term actions taken to carry out a strategy (Topic 1.4.1).

Strategy answers three questions: Where are we now? Where do we want to be? How will we get there? Its purpose is to give the whole organisation a coordinated direction, to allocate scarce resources to the most important priorities, and to build a lasting competitive advantage — a reason customers choose this business over its rivals.

Strategic management: analysis, choice and implementation
Definition Strategic management is the process of analysing a business's position, choosing a strategy and implementing it, then reviewing its success.
StageKey questionTools and activities
Strategic analysisWhere are we now, and what is happening around us?SWOT, PEST, Porter's five forces, core competence framework, market research, financial ratio analysis
Strategic choiceWhich direction should we take?Ansoff matrix, blue ocean strategy, decision trees, scenario planning, investment appraisal
Strategic implementationHow do we make it happen?Corporate planning, budgets, organisational structure, leadership, culture, force field analysis, managing change

The stages form a cycle: after implementation, results are reviewed against objectives and the analysis begins again.

SWOT analysis
Definition SWOT analysis is a framework for assessing a business's internal Strengths and Weaknesses and the external Opportunities and Threats it faces.
Figure 1: The SWOT framework
Strengths (internal)Weaknesses (internal)Opportunities (external)Threats (external)
Strong brand; loyal customers; low costs; skilled staff; patents; strong financesOutdated products; high debt; poor location; weak online presence; skills gapsGrowing markets; new technology; trade agreements; rivals' weaknesses; changing tastesNew competitors; recession; rising costs; regulation; substitute products

SWOT is most useful when it leads to strategy: using strengths to exploit opportunities, and fixing weaknesses that expose the business to threats. Limitations: it is subjective, can become a long unprioritised list, and is only a snapshot of one moment.

PEST analysis
Definition PEST analysis is a framework for analysing the Political, Economic, Social and Technological factors in a business's external environment. Extended versions add Legal and Environmental factors (PESTLE).

PEST provides the detail behind the 'opportunities' and 'threats' in SWOT, drawing on the external influences in Topic 6.1. Its value depends on identifying the few factors that really matter to the business and estimating their likely impact — not on listing everything.

Porter's five forces
Definition Porter's five forces is a framework for analysing the competitive structure of an industry and so its likely profitability, by examining five forces: rivalry among existing competitors, the threat of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, the bargaining power of suppliers and the bargaining power of buyers.
Figure 2: Porter's five forces
ForceStrong (bad for profitability) when…
Rivalry among existing competitorsMany similar-sized rivals; slow market growth; products are similar; high fixed costs; high exit barriers
Threat of new entrantsLow barriers to entry — little capital needed, no economies of scale, weak brand loyalty, easy access to distribution
Threat of substitutesClose alternatives from other industries exist and customers can switch cheaply
Bargaining power of suppliersFew suppliers; unique inputs; high costs of switching supplier
Bargaining power of buyersFew, large buyers; products are standardised; buyers can easily switch or make the product themselves
Example Indian airlines face strong forces: intense rivalry, powerful aircraft and fuel suppliers, price-sensitive buyers using comparison websites, and substitutes such as Vande Bharat trains — which helps explain the industry's history of failures (Kingfisher, Jet Airways). By contrast, Asian Paints benefits from strong brand loyalty and an extensive dealer network that act as barriers to entry, supporting high profitability.
Core competence framework
Definition A core competence is a distinctive capability or combination of skills, knowledge and technologies that gives a business a competitive advantage. Prahalad and Hamel suggested it meets three tests: it gives access to a wide variety of markets, it makes a significant contribution to the benefits customers perceive, and it is difficult for competitors to imitate.

The framework encourages businesses to build strategy around what they do uniquely well — and to outsource activities that are not core (Topic 4.3.2). Examples: Honda's competence in engines (cars, motorcycles, generators, lawnmowers); Infosys's competence in large-scale IT project delivery; Amul's competence in dairy procurement from millions of farmers. Limitation: competences can become core rigidities when markets change — a strength in film photography became a weakness for Kodak.

Ansoff matrix
Definition The Ansoff matrix is a model showing four growth strategies, based on whether a business sells existing or new products in existing or new markets, and the level of risk of each.
Figure 3: The Ansoff matrix
StrategyMeaningRiskExample
Market penetrationSelling more of existing products in existing markets (promotion, pricing, loyalty)Lowest — known products and customersMaggi promotions to increase consumption in India
Market developmentSelling existing products in new markets (new countries or segments)Medium — new customersIndian IT firms entering new countries; Royal Enfield expanding in Europe and the USA
Product developmentSelling new products in existing marketsMedium — new productTata Motors launching EVs to existing car buyers
DiversificationNew products in new marketsHighest — both unknownReliance moving from petrochemicals into telecoms (Jio) and retail

The matrix helps managers recognise the risk of each growth option. It does not say which option is best — that depends on the business's resources, the state of its current market and the competences it can transfer.

Blue ocean strategy
Definition Blue ocean strategy (Kim and Mauborgne) is creating new, uncontested market space — a 'blue ocean' — where competition is irrelevant, rather than fighting rivals in existing, crowded markets ('red oceans').

The key idea is value innovation: simultaneously offering buyers a leap in value while lowering costs, by asking which industry factors to eliminate, reduce, raise and create. Cirque du Soleil eliminated circus animals and star performers (high cost) and created theatre-style storylines, attracting adult audiences willing to pay more. Nintendo's Wii targeted non-gamers with motion controls instead of competing on graphics. In India, Zerodha created a mass market of first-time retail investors with low-cost online broking. Limitation: blue oceans attract imitators and eventually turn red.

Scenario planning
Definition Scenario planning is a strategic tool in which a business develops several plausible pictures of the future (scenarios) and plans how it would respond to each, rather than relying on a single forecast.

Scenarios might cover different oil prices, economic conditions, technologies or regulations. The business can test its strategy against each, identify early-warning signs, and prepare responses — making it more resilient to uncertainty. Shell famously used scenario planning to respond quickly to the 1973 oil crisis. Limitations: time-consuming, and no set of scenarios can cover every possibility.

Force field analysis
Definition Force field analysis (Lewin) is a technique for analysing a proposed change by identifying the driving forces that support it and the restraining forces that oppose it, and estimating their strength.
Figure 4: Force field analysis for introducing an automated packing line (strength scored 1–5)

In Figure 4, the driving forces total 10 and the restraining forces 9, so the change is likely to succeed — but only narrowly. Managers can increase the chance of success by strengthening driving forces or, often more effectively, by weakening restraining forces: for example, reducing employee resistance through consultation, retraining guarantees and clear communication. Limitation: the scores are subjective estimates.

Decision trees
Definition A decision tree is a diagram that sets out the options available in a decision, the possible outcomes of each, their probabilities and financial results, so that the expected value of each option can be calculated.
Expected value = the sum of (probability of each outcome × its financial result).
Figure 5: Decision tree for launching a new product or upgrading an existing one
Worked calculation

Squares are decision nodes; circles are chance nodes. Probabilities at each chance node must add up to 1.
Launch new product: EV = (0.6 × $6.0m) + (0.4 × $1.0m) = 3.6 + 0.4 = $4.0m; net = 4.0 − 2.0 cost = $2.0m
Upgrade existing product: EV = (0.7 × $2.5m) + (0.3 × $1.0m) = 1.75 + 0.3 = $2.05m; net = 2.05 − 0.5 = $1.55m
On financial grounds the business should launch the new product (net EV $2.0m > $1.55m). The rejected option is marked with two lines (//).

Benefits of decision treesLimitations
Set out options and outcomes clearly, forcing logical thinkingProbabilities and financial outcomes are estimates — often subjective
Quantify risk and allow options to be comparedExpected values are averages: the actual outcome will be one branch, not the EV
Encourage managers to consider all possible outcomesIgnore qualitative factors (staff, brand, ethics) and attitudes to risk
Useful where reasonable data exists from past experienceCan become complex; quickly out of date

Note that the new product carries greater risk: there is a 40% chance of receiving only $1.0m after spending $2.0m — a net loss of $1.0m. A risk-averse business with weak finances might rationally choose the upgrade despite its lower expected value.

🔒 Also in the full notes
Join to unlock the full notesAlready a member? Log in
Try the Unit 6 case study →← 6.1 External Influences on Business Activity